NAS pSEO Landing
Region Focus · APAC
Estimate usable capacity, fault tolerance, and efficiency for APAC homelab buyers using 4x 8TB in RAID 5.
Raw Capacity
32.00 TB
Usable Capacity
21.60 TB
Fault Tolerance
1 drive
Efficiency
75.0%
Balanced capacity and redundancy, but rebuild stress can be high on large disks. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.
Run Interactive Calculator →| Mode | Usable | Tolerance | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 5 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID 6 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
| RAID 10 | 14.40 TB | 1 drive per mirror pair* | 50.0% |
| RAID-Z1 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID-Z2 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
APAC builders frequently compare availability windows and procurement variance, which makes robust fallback capacity and staged scaling useful in practice.
Regional differences in disk availability and replacement lead times.
Policy of keeping spare disks available to reduce recovery delay risk.
Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.
For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.
This setup can tolerate 1 drive. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.
No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.