← NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Region Focus · EU

EU 4x 8TB RAID 5 Calculator

Estimate usable capacity, fault tolerance, and efficiency for EU homelab buyers using 4x 8TB in RAID 5.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

32.00 TB

Usable Capacity

21.60 TB

Fault Tolerance

1 drive

Efficiency

75.0%

Balanced capacity and redundancy, but rebuild stress can be high on large disks. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator →

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 21.60 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID 6 14.40 TB 2 drives 50.0%
RAID 10 14.40 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 21.60 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID-Z2 14.40 TB 2 drives 50.0%

EU Buyer Context

EU deployments often place additional emphasis on energy efficiency and predictable lifecycle upgrades, especially for always-on NAS fleets.

Brand / Region Glossary

Lifecycle Planning

Capacity and reliability strategy across multiple hardware refresh cycles.

Operational Headroom

Intentional free-space margin to protect performance and snapshot behavior.

Related Long-Tail Calculators

2x 4TB RAID 1 2x 6TB RAID 1 2x 8TB RAID 1 2x 10TB RAID 1 2x 12TB RAID 1 2x 14TB RAID 1 2x 16TB RAID 1 2x 18TB RAID 1 2x 20TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 5 3x 4TB RAID-Z1 3x 6TB RAID 1 3x 6TB RAID 5 3x 6TB RAID-Z1 3x 8TB RAID 1

FAQ

How much real-world usable storage does 4x 8TB RAID 5 provide?

For EU homelab buyers, this NAS planning scenario estimates 21.60 TB usable after a 10% reserve from 32.00 TB raw.

How many disk failures can RAID 5 tolerate in this setup?

This setup can tolerate 1 drive. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS available space?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.