NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Brand Focus · Synology

Synology 10x 8TB RAID 10 NAS Calculator

Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for Synology NAS users using 10x 8TB in RAID 10.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

80.00 TB

Usable Capacity

36.00 TB

Fault Tolerance

1 drive per mirror pair*

Efficiency

50.0%

Excellent random I/O and rebuild behavior; capacity is typically 50% of raw. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 64.80 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID 6 57.60 TB 2 drives 80.0%
RAID 10 36.00 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 64.80 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID-Z2 57.60 TB 2 drives 80.0%

Synology Planning Notes

Synology users usually optimize for predictable rebuild behavior and conservative free-space policies, especially when using large-capacity SHR/RAID pools for media and backup workloads.

Brand / Region Glossary

SHR

Synology Hybrid RAID that improves flexibility when mixing drive sizes.

Btrfs Snapshots

Point-in-time snapshots used for rollback and data protection policies.

Storage Pool

Logical disk group where RAID layout is created before volumes are provisioned.

NAS Cluster Guides

Related Long-Tail Calculators

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

FAQ

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Is RAID 10 still practical with 8TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

How many disk failures can RAID 10 tolerate in this setup?

This setup can tolerate 1 drive per mirror pair*. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.

Should I optimize this 10-drive plan for storage headroom or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.