NAS pSEO Landing
Brand Focus · TrueNAS
Estimate usable capacity, fault tolerance, and efficiency for TrueNAS NAS users using 4x 8TB in RAID 10.
Raw Capacity
32.00 TB
Usable Capacity
14.40 TB
Fault Tolerance
1 drive per mirror pair*
Efficiency
50.0%
Excellent random I/O and rebuild behavior; capacity is typically 50% of raw. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.
Run Interactive Calculator →| Mode | Usable | Tolerance | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 5 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID 6 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
| RAID 10 | 14.40 TB | 1 drive per mirror pair* | 50.0% |
| RAID-Z1 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID-Z2 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
TrueNAS and ZFS planners usually care about parity width, scrub cadence, and healthy operating headroom. Capacity is only one part of pool durability.
A virtual device group in ZFS; multiple vdevs form a storage pool.
Background integrity scan that verifies checksums and repairs parity mismatches.
ZFS feature set and planning topic for growing parity groups safely.
For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.
No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.
Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.
It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.