NAS pSEO Landing
Brand Focus · TrueNAS
Estimate usable capacity, fault tolerance, and efficiency for TrueNAS NAS users using 4x 8TB in RAID 6.
Raw Capacity
32.00 TB
Usable Capacity
14.40 TB
Fault Tolerance
2 drives
Efficiency
50.0%
Safer for larger arrays with dual parity, at the cost of one extra parity disk. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.
Run Interactive Calculator →| Mode | Usable | Tolerance | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 5 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID 6 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
| RAID 10 | 14.40 TB | 1 drive per mirror pair* | 50.0% |
| RAID-Z1 | 21.60 TB | 1 drive | 75.0% |
| RAID-Z2 | 14.40 TB | 2 drives | 50.0% |
TrueNAS and ZFS planners usually care about parity width, scrub cadence, and healthy operating headroom. Capacity is only one part of pool durability.
A virtual device group in ZFS; multiple vdevs form a storage pool.
Background integrity scan that verifies checksums and repairs parity mismatches.
ZFS feature set and planning topic for growing parity groups safely.
This setup can tolerate 2 drives. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.
For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.
No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.
It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.