NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Brand Focus · Synology

Synology 10x 16TB RAID 10 NAS Calculator

Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for Synology NAS users using 10x 16TB in RAID 10.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

160.00 TB

Usable Capacity

72.00 TB

Fault Tolerance

1 drive per mirror pair*

Efficiency

50.0%

Excellent random I/O and rebuild behavior; capacity is typically 50% of raw. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 129.60 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID 6 115.20 TB 2 drives 80.0%
RAID 10 72.00 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 129.60 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID-Z2 115.20 TB 2 drives 80.0%

Synology Planning Notes

Synology users usually optimize for predictable rebuild behavior and conservative free-space policies, especially when using large-capacity SHR/RAID pools for media and backup workloads.

Brand / Region Glossary

SHR

Synology Hybrid RAID that improves flexibility when mixing drive sizes.

Btrfs Snapshots

Point-in-time snapshots used for rollback and data protection policies.

Storage Pool

Logical disk group where RAID layout is created before volumes are provisioned.

NAS Cluster Guides

Related Long-Tail Calculators

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

FAQ

How much real-world usable storage does 10x 16TB RAID 10 provide?

For Synology users, this NAS planning scenario estimates 72.00 TB usable after a 10% reserve from 160.00 TB raw.

How many disk failures can RAID 10 tolerate in this setup?

This setup can tolerate 1 drive per mirror pair*. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.

Is RAID 10 still viable with 16TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS available space?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.