NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Brand Focus · Synology

Synology 4x 12TB RAID-Z2 NAS Calculator

Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for Synology NAS users using 4x 12TB in RAID-Z2.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

48.00 TB

Usable Capacity

21.60 TB

Fault Tolerance

2 drives

Efficiency

50.0%

Popular TrueNAS default for medium arrays; dual-parity with good safety margin. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 32.40 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID 6 21.60 TB 2 drives 50.0%
RAID 10 21.60 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 32.40 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID-Z2 21.60 TB 2 drives 50.0%

Synology Planning Notes

Synology users usually optimize for predictable rebuild behavior and conservative free-space policies, especially when using large-capacity SHR/RAID pools for media and backup workloads.

Brand / Region Glossary

SHR

Synology Hybrid RAID that improves flexibility when mixing drive sizes.

Btrfs Snapshots

Point-in-time snapshots used for rollback and data protection policies.

Storage Pool

Logical disk group where RAID layout is created before volumes are provisioned.

NAS Cluster Guides

Related Long-Tail Calculators

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

FAQ

How much real-world usable storage does 4x 12TB RAID-Z2 provide?

For Synology users, this NAS planning scenario estimates 21.60 TB usable after a 10% reserve from 48.00 TB raw.

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Should I optimize this 4-drive plan for storage headroom or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS available space?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.