NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Brand Focus · Synology

Synology 4x 16TB RAID-Z2 NAS Calculator

Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for Synology NAS users using 4x 16TB in RAID-Z2.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

64.00 TB

Usable Capacity

28.80 TB

Fault Tolerance

2 drives

Efficiency

50.0%

Popular TrueNAS default for medium arrays; dual-parity with good safety margin. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 43.20 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID 6 28.80 TB 2 drives 50.0%
RAID 10 28.80 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 43.20 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID-Z2 28.80 TB 2 drives 50.0%

Synology Planning Notes

Synology users usually optimize for predictable rebuild behavior and conservative free-space policies, especially when using large-capacity SHR/RAID pools for media and backup workloads.

Brand / Region Glossary

SHR

Synology Hybrid RAID that improves flexibility when mixing drive sizes.

Btrfs Snapshots

Point-in-time snapshots used for rollback and data protection policies.

Storage Pool

Logical disk group where RAID layout is created before volumes are provisioned.

NAS Cluster Guides

Related Long-Tail Calculators

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

FAQ

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

How much real-world usable storage does 4x 16TB RAID-Z2 provide?

For Synology users, this NAS planning scenario estimates 28.80 TB usable after a 10% reserve from 64.00 TB raw.

Is RAID-Z2 still worth deploying with 16TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Should I optimize this 4-drive plan for storage headroom or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.