UK 10x 20TB RAID-Z1 NAS Calculator

Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for UK homelab buyers using 10x 20TB in RAID-Z1.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

200.00 TB

Usable Capacity

162.00 TB

Fault Tolerance

1 drive

Efficiency

90.0%

ZFS single-parity equivalent of RAID 5; common for smaller homelab pools. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator →

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode	Usable	Tolerance	Efficiency
RAID 5	162.00 TB	1 drive	90.0%
RAID 6	144.00 TB	2 drives	80.0%
RAID 10	90.00 TB	1 drive per mirror pair*	50.0%
RAID-Z1	162.00 TB	1 drive	90.0%
RAID-Z2	144.00 TB	2 drives	80.0%

UK Buyer Context

UK homelab planners commonly balance higher per-drive pricing with power and chassis constraints, so efficient but resilient layouts become more valuable.

• Model dual-parity options early if rebuild time is a concern.
• Include reserve headroom to avoid running pools at high fill percentages.

Brand / Region Glossary

Power Budget

Expected always-on energy usage cost factored into NAS layout decisions.

Rebuild Window

Estimated time exposure while replacing a failed drive and restoring parity.

NAS Cluster Guides

NAS Hub RAID Level Compare RAID Capacity Matrix Planning Quick Sheet RAID Selector NAS FAQ

Related Long-Tail Calculators

2x 4TB RAID 1 2x 6TB RAID 1 2x 8TB RAID 1 2x 10TB RAID 1 2x 12TB RAID 1 2x 14TB RAID 1 2x 16TB RAID 1 2x 18TB RAID 1 2x 20TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 5 3x 4TB RAID-Z1 3x 6TB RAID 1 3x 6TB RAID 5 3x 6TB RAID-Z1 3x 8TB RAID 1

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

← Previous: US 10x 20TB RAID-Z1 NAS Calculator Next: EU 10x 20TB RAID-Z1 NAS Calculator →

FAQ

How many disk failures can RAID-Z1 tolerate in this setup?

This setup can tolerate 1 drive. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.

Is RAID-Z1 still viable with 20TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS available space?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.

Should I optimize this 10-drive plan for capacity or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.