NAS pSEO Landing
Region Focus · UK
Estimate usable TB, parity, and fault tolerance for UK homelab buyers using 8x 8TB in RAID 5.
Raw Capacity
64.00 TB
Usable Capacity
50.40 TB
Fault Tolerance
1 drive
Efficiency
87.5%
Balanced capacity and redundancy, but rebuild stress can be high on large disks. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.
Run Interactive Calculator →| Mode | Usable | Tolerance | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 5 | 50.40 TB | 1 drive | 87.5% |
| RAID 6 | 43.20 TB | 2 drives | 75.0% |
| RAID 10 | 28.80 TB | 1 drive per mirror pair* | 50.0% |
| RAID-Z1 | 50.40 TB | 1 drive | 87.5% |
| RAID-Z2 | 43.20 TB | 2 drives | 75.0% |
UK homelab planners commonly balance higher per-drive pricing with power and chassis constraints, so efficient but resilient layouts become more valuable.
Expected always-on energy usage cost factored into NAS layout decisions.
Estimated time exposure while replacing a failed drive and restoring parity.
Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.
This setup can tolerate 1 drive. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.
For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.
It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.