NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

Brand Focus · Unraid

Unraid RAID 1 vs RAID 5 Calculator

Compare usable TB, parity, and failure tolerance between RAID 1 and RAID 5 for Unraid NAS users.

Comparison Notes

This page compares RAID 1 and RAID 5 on identical hardware assumptions to help homelab builders choose between capacity efficiency and fault tolerance.

  • Disk size baseline: 8TB drives
  • Reserve policy: 10% filesystem headroom
  • Use the interactive tool for exact real-world constraints
Open Interactive Planner

Storage Capacity Table

Drives RAID 1 RAID 5 Delta
4x 8TB 7.20 TB 21.60 TB -14.40 TB
6x 8TB 7.20 TB 36.00 TB -28.80 TB
8x 8TB 7.20 TB 50.40 TB -43.20 TB
10x 8TB 7.20 TB 64.80 TB -57.60 TB
12x 8TB 7.20 TB 79.20 TB -72.00 TB

Unraid Planning Notes

Unraid users often optimize for incremental growth and flexible disk replacement, where parity planning and usable capacity targets evolve over time rather than all at once.

Brand / Region Glossary

Parity Disk

Dedicated parity disk(s) protecting data disks in the Unraid array model.

Cache Pool

Fast SSD/NVMe pool used for writes and application workloads.

Mover

Scheduled process that migrates data between cache and array tiers.

NAS Cluster Guides

Related Long-Tail Calculators

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

FAQ

Does this comparison include filesystem reserve?

Yes. The comparison table applies a 10% reserve baseline to reflect realistic operating headroom in NAS and homelab environments.

Can two layouts with similar available space still have very different rebuild risk?

Yes. Similar usable TB does not imply similar failure tolerance or rebuild exposure. Capacity and resiliency should be evaluated together.

Which option is usually better for long-term homelab growth?

The better option is the one that keeps acceptable usable capacity while preserving safety margins during future disk expansions.

How should I choose between RAID 1 and RAID 5?

Choose based on your risk tolerance, rebuild window, and performance profile. Higher parity usually lowers capacity but improves resilience.