NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS planning example

10x 8TB RAID 10 NAS Calculator | Usable TB

Estimate usable TB, parity overhead, and fault tolerance for 10x 8TB in RAID 10. Includes reserve planning for NAS and homelab arrays.

Planning route

Answer the capacity question, then validate the purchase path

Use this worked example as a numeric starting point, then validate the RAID choice, capacity reserve, hardware plan, and backup path.

Editorial method

What this calculator can—and cannot—decide

The capacity model makes drive count, drive size, RAID layout, and reserve visible. It is a planning aid: it does not predict exact performance, rebuild duration, hardware compatibility, or the probability of data loss for a specific system.

Last reviewed: July 10, 2026. Product links remain neutral category searches until a partner relationship and page-level disclosure are in place.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

80.00 TB

Usable Capacity

36.00 TB

Fault Tolerance

1 drive per mirror pair*

Efficiency

50.0%

Excellent random I/O and rebuild behavior; capacity is typically 50% of raw. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 64.80 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID 6 57.60 TB 2 drives 80.0%
RAID 10 36.00 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 64.80 TB 1 drive 90.0%
RAID-Z2 57.60 TB 2 drives 80.0%

NAS cluster navigation

Move through the storage decision path

All apps

Related long-tail calculators

Sequential long-tail navigation

FAQ

Is RAID 10 still practical with 8TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS capacity?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Should I optimize this 10-drive plan for available space or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.