NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS planning example

3x 14TB RAID 1 NAS Calculator | Usable TB

Estimate usable TB, parity overhead, and fault tolerance for 3x 14TB in RAID 1. Includes reserve planning for NAS and homelab arrays.

Planning route

Answer the capacity question, then validate the purchase path

Use this worked example as a numeric starting point, then validate the RAID choice, capacity reserve, hardware plan, and backup path.

Editorial method

What this calculator can—and cannot—decide

The capacity model makes drive count, drive size, RAID layout, and reserve visible. It is a planning aid: it does not predict exact performance, rebuild duration, hardware compatibility, or the probability of data loss for a specific system.

Last reviewed: July 10, 2026. Product links remain neutral category searches until a partner relationship and page-level disclosure are in place.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

42.00 TB

Usable Capacity

12.60 TB

Fault Tolerance

2 drives*

Efficiency

33.3%

Strong redundancy but low capacity efficiency. Great for small, critical datasets. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 25.20 TB 1 drive 66.7%
RAID 6 N/A N/A N/A
RAID 10 N/A N/A N/A
RAID-Z1 25.20 TB 1 drive 66.7%
RAID-Z2 N/A N/A N/A

NAS cluster navigation

Move through the storage decision path

All apps

Related long-tail calculators

Sequential long-tail navigation

FAQ

How many disk failures can RAID 1 tolerate in this setup?

This setup can tolerate 2 drives*. Real-world survivability depends on mirror placement, rebuild stress, and drive health.

Is RAID 1 still viable with 14TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

How much real-world usable storage does 3x 14TB RAID 1 provide?

This NAS planning scenario estimates 12.60 TB usable after a 10% reserve from 42.00 TB raw.

Should I optimize this 3-drive plan for capacity or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.