← NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS pSEO Landing

4x 16TB RAID-Z2 NAS Calculator | Usable TB

Estimate usable TB, parity overhead, and fault tolerance for 4x 16TB in RAID-Z2. Includes reserve planning for NAS and homelab arrays.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

64.00 TB

Usable Capacity

28.80 TB

Fault Tolerance

2 drives

Efficiency

50.0%

Popular TrueNAS default for medium arrays; dual-parity with good safety margin. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator →

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 43.20 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID 6 28.80 TB 2 drives 50.0%
RAID 10 28.80 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 43.20 TB 1 drive 75.0%
RAID-Z2 28.80 TB 2 drives 50.0%

NAS Cluster Guides

NAS Hub RAID Level Compare RAID Capacity Matrix Planning Quick Sheet RAID Selector NAS FAQ

Related Long-Tail Calculators

2x 4TB RAID 1 2x 6TB RAID 1 2x 8TB RAID 1 2x 10TB RAID 1 2x 12TB RAID 1 2x 14TB RAID 1 2x 16TB RAID 1 2x 18TB RAID 1 2x 20TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 1 3x 4TB RAID 5 3x 4TB RAID-Z1 3x 6TB RAID 1 3x 6TB RAID 5 3x 6TB RAID-Z1 3x 8TB RAID 1

Sequential Long-Tail Navigation

← Previous: 4x 16TB RAID-Z1 NAS Calculator | Usable TB Next: 4x 18TB RAID 1 NAS Calculator | Usable TB →

FAQ

Is RAID-Z2 still practical with 16TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Should I optimize this 4-drive plan for storage headroom or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS available space?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.