NAS & RAID Calculator

NAS planning example

6x 20TB RAID 6 NAS Calculator | Usable TB

Estimate usable TB, parity overhead, and fault tolerance for 6x 20TB in RAID 6. Includes reserve planning for NAS and homelab arrays.

Planning route

Answer the capacity question, then validate the purchase path

Use this worked example as a numeric starting point, then validate the RAID choice, capacity reserve, hardware plan, and backup path.

Editorial method

What this calculator can—and cannot—decide

The capacity model makes drive count, drive size, RAID layout, and reserve visible. It is a planning aid: it does not predict exact performance, rebuild duration, hardware compatibility, or the probability of data loss for a specific system.

Last reviewed: July 10, 2026. Product links remain neutral category searches until a partner relationship and page-level disclosure are in place.

Capacity Snapshot

Raw Capacity

120.00 TB

Usable Capacity

72.00 TB

Fault Tolerance

2 drives

Efficiency

66.7%

Safer for larger arrays with dual parity, at the cost of one extra parity disk. This scenario applies a 10% filesystem reserve.

Run Interactive Calculator

Alternative Mode Comparison

Mode Usable Tolerance Efficiency
RAID 5 90.00 TB 1 drive 83.3%
RAID 6 72.00 TB 2 drives 66.7%
RAID 10 54.00 TB 1 drive per mirror pair* 50.0%
RAID-Z1 90.00 TB 1 drive 83.3%
RAID-Z2 72.00 TB 2 drives 66.7%

NAS cluster navigation

Move through the storage decision path

All apps

Related long-tail calculators

Sequential long-tail navigation

FAQ

Can this calculator replace real-world benchmark and rebuild testing?

No. Use this page for pre-purchase sizing, then validate with workload benchmarks, SMART health policy, and a tested restore plan.

Is RAID 6 still practical with 20TB drives?

It can be practical, but larger drives increase rebuild windows. Validate parity choice and backup policy before committing to the final layout.

Why include a 10% reserve when planning NAS capacity?

Keeping free space improves filesystem behavior for snapshots, metadata, and write performance. Full arrays often perform worse and rebuild more slowly.

Should I optimize this 6-drive plan for storage headroom or resiliency first?

For long-lived NAS pools, resiliency first is usually safer. Capacity can be expanded later, while a risky parity choice can force migration sooner.